The study explores trends in attendee preferences, factors in destination selection, and how incentive travel...
Research / Reward Preferences: Making a Lasting Impact on Incentive Program Participants
by Incentive Research Foundation
Simple ‘one size fits all’ approaches to reward and recognition may not achieve their full potential in motivating and engaging employees.
During these challenging times, employees in all industries need to feel valued, particularly those who put themselves at risk through public interactions. Many companies are forced to do more with less, putting an additional strain on human resources. While many executives and managers want to express appreciation for outstanding performance, they often lack insight as to which recognition strategies appeal the most to their workers.
A key consideration is that, sometimes, what people say they want most may not be linked to the intended outcomes of the incentive program. For example, cash bonuses were highly rated by employees as a preferred reward, but cash bonuses were not associated with high levels of engagement. Given this disconnect between preferences and performance, the goals of this study are:
The study examines two types of rewards:
The study sample was 1500 US-based respondents who were employed full-time (35 hours+ per week). Respondents could not be self-employed, an independent contractor, or temporary worker.
The survey was approximately 15 minutes in length.
The respondents were divided across a diverse number of industries, with no single industry representing more than 14% of the total sample. The gender of the sample was almost an even split ( males 51%; females 49%) and evenly balanced between Millennials (30%), Gen X (30%), and Baby Boomers (36%), with a small number of Gen Z (18-22) and Silent Generation members (75+) making up the rest of the sample.
Preferred Rewards: The Gifts of Time and Experiences Take Precedence
Employees ranked getting a paid day off as the top preference.
Remaining top five preferences focused on experiences:
Lowest ranked recognition approaches:
The low rankings, however, do not necessarily suggest these forms of recognition have no value. Several of these approaches are associated with higher employee engagement outcomes, as will be described later in this paper.
Generational Differences are Apparent
Even among top and bottom ranked preferences, there are some who reverse the order of preference.
There is no recognition strategy that is universally embraced or dismissed.
There are some gender differences in reward preferences.
Annual Rewards: Employees Express Strong Preference for Cash Bonuses
While cash bonuses received a top three rank from 88% of respondents, other annual rewards were associated with higher levels of engagement and motivation, as will be explained later in this paper. Often cash bonuses are treated similarly to compensation and used to pay expenses rather than having the same trophy value or emotional resonance as some of the other reward options.
The only other annual rewards that had over 30% ranking them in their top three were:
Highly Preferred Reward & Recognition Types Are Significantly Under-Utilized
Many highly preferred recognition types were awarded to less than 10% of respondents.
However, two forms of recognition that ranked high in preference, flexible scheduling and paid time off were the two most common ways people were recognized.
Satisfaction with Recognition Has a Clear Impact on Engagement Outcomes
The data make a compelling case for the impact of recognition on employee engagement outcomes. Respondents were asked to rate various facets of engagement. Being extremely satisfied with recognition is associated with increases in job satisfaction by a factor of 14x, compared to those dissatisfied with recognition efforts.
Comparing those who are most satisfied with recognition versus those dissatisfied, also showed that those who are most satisfied are:
The Most Popular Rewards Are Not Always Associated With High Levels of Engagement
While the sample sizes were not always large, the study looked at which rewards were most associated with high engagement levels. As an example, the five recognition approaches shown below are associated with the highest scores on job satisfaction. The reward types that were associated with the highest levels of job satisfaction were (ratings on a 5 point scale):
Note that getting a special parking spot at work and getting recognized in the corporate newsletter were among the lowest rated preferences. The data show that certain types of recognition are associated with favorable job satisfaction, as well as other positive engagement scores. This suggests that, while some things may not be a top of mind preference, they are still greatly appreciated by the recipients.
Another theme that emerges from these items is the focus on family (e.g., having a gift or token of appreciation sent to family members, having lunch or dinner with your family paid for by the company) which re-emphasizes the high importance many people place on their families during this time of national challenge. It underscores the importance of recognizing ‘family’ as a strong cultural value of companies.
Annual Rewards: Cash Bonuses Are Also Not Strong Drivers of Engagement
With regard to annual awards, cash bonuses were almost universally a top pick of how employees wanted to be rewarded. Yet, receiving a cash bonus was ranked sixth when rewards were correlated to job satisfaction and for motivation to do best work.
Shifts in Preferences in Tangible Non-Cash Rewards Since the Pandemic
Given that the world has changed dramatically since the pandemic, we would expect that preferences in how people like to be recognized and rewarded would change as well.
However, the study revealed that only 16% indicated their reward and recognition preferences had changed. Among this 16%:
Interest in Incentive Travel Still High Since Pandemic
Since there was wide variation in interest and willingness to travel, we looked at net interest in rewards. Some respondents indicated they did not want to travel, while others showed an increase in incentive travel experiences, particularly those that were within a driving distance and involved less interaction with people.
Rewards and Recognition
Family Matters
Effects of the Pandemic
Determining Preferences
Motivating Behavior and Making an Impact
Thank you to our Research Advocacy Partner
During this IRF webinar, we compared data from the 2024 Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel study to what is really happening in incentive travel programs. We illustrate how attendee preferences line up against planner data as reported in the newly released 2024 Incentive Travel Index as well as actual bookings through Cvent. We explore how…
The 2024 Incentive Travel Index (ITI) reports that, overall, growth is projected for the incentive travel industry through 2026. Incentive travel buyers expect activity and per person spending above 2024 levels over the next two years.