The IRF's first-ever study focused solely on the European market explores trends in European attendee...
Research / 2025 European Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel
by Incentive Research Foundation
As a high-value experience, incentive travel remains one of the most impactful ways an organization can drive employee performance and strengthen company culture. To maximize the effectiveness of these programs, it’s crucial to design them with careful attention to both the destination and the experiences offered. Whether it’s a relaxing beach retreat, an adventurous mountain escape, or a culturally immersive city trip, the right destination, accommodations, and actives ensure that employees fully engage with and appreciate the reward.
Designed and commissioned by the Incentive Research Foundation, the 2025 European Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel study builds on a similar study conducted in North America, providing valuable insights into the specific preferences and motivations of European employees. By identifying what participants value most in terms of destination features, travel accommodations, and overall program design, the study offers a data-driven foundation for companies to create more personalized and effective incentive travel programs.
The 2025 European Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel study, conducted in the fourth quarter of 2024, surveyed 600 full-time employees from across Europe. Respondents were selected from sales and marketing roles, who were all eligible for an incentive travel award within the past three years to ensure the relevance of their insights.
The survey was distributed across three key regions: Central Europe (including Austria, Germany, and Switzerland), Eastern Europe (including Poland and Turkey), Southern Europe (including France, Italy, and Spain), and the UK/Ireland, providing a broad perspective of the region. Respondents represented a diverse range of industries, including retail, IT, manufacturing, professional services, banking, education, and healthcare, among others. The respondent pool was predominantly male (70%), ranging in age from 23 to 65 years old. Notably, 71% were from the Gen Z and Millennial age groups, while 29% were from Gen X and Baby Boomer generations. Additionally, 79% of respondents have children living at home.
It is important to note that 69% of study respondents have previously won an incentive travel award within the last three years. Noting that this concentration is considerably higher than the general population of incentive reward program participants, response data has been analyzed by each of the various demographic segments. Significant differences are noted where there is potential for organizations to tailor their incentive travel award program to their specific employee base.
Nearly all employees eligible for incentive travel (99.8%) find at least some value in the award, with over 75% reporting that it holds ‘a great deal of value.’ This strong sentiment is particularly pronounced among recent travel award winners but is consistent across all respondent groups.
Group travel rewards also hold significant appeal, with 97% of participants indicating they are motivated by the award, and 55% finding group travel ‘extremely motivating.’ Eastern Europeans are especially drawn to group travel, as over 67% describe this incentive award as ‘extremely motivating.’ Additionally, women are 16% more likely than men to find group travel ‘extremely motivating’ (66% versus 50%).
These findings highlight the powerful role that both individual and group incentive travel can play in motivating employees. However, this appeal is contingent upon selecting a desirable destination, which underscores the importance of understanding what destinations resonate most with employees.
While there are some fluctuations in rankings, particularly by region, the overarching features that emerged from the survey consistently ranked at the top. These variations, explored further in the reference deck, offer valuable insights into regional preferences and highlight the importance of tailoring incentive programs to specific employee demographics.
Considering all of the important features of an incentive travel reward, study participants identify European and Asian destinations as those with the greatest appeal. These following regions offer the allure of both familiar and unique experiences that resonate with employees across various demographic groups:
When respondents were asked to recommend incentive destinations based on their prior experience travelling, these destinations continued to be viewed as favorable. However, among those who have previously traveled to North America for business or leisure, certain destinations received high recommendations for future incentive travel. While Europe remains the clear preference, this suggests that exposure and firsthand experience may play a role in shifting perceptions of long-haul destinations.
While these destinations are favored across various demographic groups, the study found that preferences can differ based on region and individual characteristics. For instance, higher earners tend to prefer more localized travel, while lower earners are more inclined toward intercontinental destinations. Additional regional and demographic insights can be found in the study’s reference deck.
Looking beyond regional destinations, respondents identified features and experiences that a destination should include to make it an ideal location for incentive travel. Responses indicate truly desirable reward trips provide a balance of both relaxation and adventure. The most successful incentive travel destinations are those that provide a variety of experiences, ensuring that every participant finds something to enjoy. The following destination features ranked highest among employees, making them essential elements of any attractive incentive travel program:
When it comes to the ideal length for incentive travel trips, preferences vary, but clear trends emerge. For both European and intercontinental destinations, employees generally favor trips that last between four and ten days, with European destinations leaning toward the shorter end (four to six days) and those outside Europe favoring slightly longer stays (seven to ten days).
For destinations within Europe, 49% of respondents prefer trips lasting four to six days, followed by 39% who prefer trips lasting seven to ten days. Only a small portion (6%) favor longer stays, and just 4% prefer shorter trips of one to three days. Similarly, when considering destinations outside of Europe, 49% prefer trips lasting seven to ten days, with 21% choosing trips lasting four to six days. Fewer respondents prefer longer trips over ten days (11%), and just 1% favor shorter trips.
Gender differences also emerge. Men are more likely than women to extend their trips before or after the official incentive period, with 35% of men choosing to extend their trips before the official start, compared to just 19% of women. On the other hand, women are more likely to prefer shorter trips, with 52% favoring four to six days for travel within Europe.
Individuals earning over €100,000 are more likely to extend their trips, with 12% extending both before and after the official travel period, compared to just 9% of those with lower household incomes. This difference suggests that employees with higher incomes may have more flexibility and are more inclined to extend their stay.
Cruising remains an incredibly appealing option for incentive travel, primarily because of the all-inclusive packages they offer. Despite being ranked lower than other destinations features, cruises provide a unique combination of convenience and luxury, including accommodations, meals, and entertainment, all bundled into one experience. This makes them an attractive choice for employees looking for a seamless, hassle-free travel experience.
Both ocean and river cruises are strong motivators for incentive travel awards. Overall, 77% of program participants say that an ocean cruise to a desirable destination is extremely motivating, while 75% feel the same about a river cruise. Regionally, respondents from the UK/Ireland show the highest level of enthusiasm, with 85% supporting ocean cruises and 81% favoring river cruises. Central and Eastern Europeans (78% each) also demonstrate strong enthusiasm for ocean cruises, though finding less interest in river cruising. Only Southern Europeans prefer river cruises over ocean cruises (73% versus 67%), but as a region, they are less inclined to be motivated by cruising overall.
Beyond the appeal of specific destinations, respondents overwhelmingly agree on the comfort and security that cruises provide. 80% of employees agree that cruise ships offer a safe and secure environment, and 82% believe they provide the same level of comfort as a luxury hotel. Additionally, 76% of respondents consider the cruise experience itself a desirable destination, regardless of where the cruise is scheduled to go, and 75% prefer the idea of exploring multiple international ports-of-call by cruise rather than staying at a hotel in just one location.
These statistics highlight how cruising can offer an ideal incentive travel experience. The all-inclusive nature of cruises, combined with their safe and luxurious environment, makes them a top choice for employees seeking motivation through travel. Whether it’s an ocean cruise with expansive amenities or a more intimate river cruise experience, cruises continue to captivate employees across diverse demographic groups.
Sustainability and external factors increasingly impact how employees view incentive travel programs. A notable 28% of respondents indicate that geopolitical issues, such as conflicts and instability, can have a negative effect on their perception of incentive travel rewards. This sentiment is particularly pronounced among Southern Europeans (39%) and lower-income earners (38%). Responses suggest the importance of considering global and political contexts when planning incentive travel, as these factors can affect both employee satisfaction and program success.
In addition, the choice of airline plays a significant role in shaping perceptions. The use of low-cost carrier airlines, compared to full-service airlines, has a positive impact on 44% of respondents, with only 8% indicating a negative effect. This trend reflects the growing desire for more sustainable and budget-conscious travel options, signaling a preference for responsible decision-making in program logistics.
Nearly half of all respondents (49%) agree that sustainability measures influence their perception of incentive travel programs. Environmental sustainability practices are top of mind for 62% of employees, highlighting the importance of eco-friendly initiatives. Furthermore, 35% emphasize sustainable travel plans, such as carbon offsetting, as key considerations when evaluating incentive travel opportunities.
Incorporating these practices into incentive programs not only aligns with broader societal trends but also strengthens the appeal of incentive programs. Companies that prioritize sustainability and ethical considerations are better positioned to develop long-standing travel rewards options that are held in high regard by their employees.
The 2025 European Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel study offers valuable insights into how organizations can design more effective and motivating incentive travel programs, and partners can assist in fulfilling these awards. To do so, focus can be narrowed to the following:
The study explores trends in attendee preferences, factors in destination selection, and how incentive travel program design can impact employee motivation.
Attendee Preferences for Incentive Travel explores the impact of destinations on motivation and value perception among the participants themselves.