The IRF's first-ever study focused solely on the European market explores trends in European attendee...
Research / Academic Research in Action: Practical Strategies for Incentive Design and Application from Nine Interviews and Two Research Studies
by Allan Schweyer, Chief Academic Advisor, IRF
In this edition of Academic Research in Action, key findings and practical takeaways from two recent papers are presented alongside advice offered by incentive and reward designers themselves. The papers are based on academic studies conducted in the US, Canada, and Portugal over the past three years, and the advice is extracted from interviews conducted with US and Canadian-based practitioners. This combination offers a unique look at how theory and findings from experiments can align with real-world application.
In their 2023 paper, An exploratory analysis of incentive packages and managerial performance, professors Alves and Laurenco examine the use of incentives as drivers of high performance among CFOs and non-CFOs in managerial positions. They focus on cash rewards, intangible non-cash rewards (e.g., training, autonomy, recognition) and benefits (e.g., health insurance, company vehicle use, flexible work, etc.).
A 2022 working paper by professors Choi and Presslee, When and why tangible rewards motivate greater effort than cash rewards, focuses on the distinction between cash and tangible rewards (e.g., gift cards, merchandise, travel), analyzing how specific attributes (fungibility, hedonic nature, novelty, and discrete framing) of these rewards influence employee effort.
Both studies contribute to understanding the complexities in incentive design. Alves & Lourenço connect their findings to theories like agency and self-determination, stressing that intrinsic motivators complement traditional incentives. Choi & Presslee apply mental accounting theory, proposing that discrete and novel tangible rewards can encourage greater effort than cash rewards by being perceived as distinct from regular pay.
The practical application of the findings from these studies are described below, with relevant reward initiatives – as shared by our interviewees – following.
Alves & Lourenço examine combinations of incentives (monetary, non-monetary, and benefits) in managerial settings, revealing that non-monetary incentives like autonomy and development opportunities are significant for high performance. They examine how different factors come together to produce specific outcomes using data from 614 managers to explore multiple incentive packages, highlighting the importance of autonomy, recognition, and tangible benefits.
Alves & Lourenço show that successful incentive packages often involve blending tangible (cash and non-cash) benefits with recognition, emphasizing that monetary incentives alone may not suffice for high performance.
Actionable advice:
Alves & Lourenco emphasize the importance of combining reward types to appeal both extrinsically and intrinsically. They did not explore tangible non-cash rewards such as merchandise and travel, but focused on rewards such as recognition, feedback, inclusion in decision-making, flexibility, autonomy, and learning.
Examples of application as shared by interviewees:
Choi & Presslee conducted experiments across four studies to identify how differences between cash and tangible rewards impact motivation. They find that tangible (non-cash) rewards can provide greater motivation than cash when perceived as distinct and novel, reinforcing that psychological perception of rewards is crucial in motivating effort. This dovetails with the practitioner quotes in items 1 and 2 above, suggesting that even rewards that many firms offer as resources to employees at all levels of performance, can be framed as highly motivating rewards for high performers when infused with exclusivity, status, and recognition.
Actionable advice
****
Both studies and the interviewees stress that non-monetary and thoughtfully designed tangible rewards can serve as cost-effective alternatives or supplements to cash bonuses and other rewards, providing higher motivational value with potentially lower financial cost.
A growing body of research demonstrates that promoting employee health and well-being can have a positive impact on company performance.
October 2021 Behavioral science is less a discrete arena of study, and more an interdisciplinary approach to gaining a better understanding of why people do what they do – and, by extension, how to influence their thoughts, actions, and choices. Sound familiar? While the science remains ill-defined – and, for most, a little mysterious –…